TH200-712 - Theology Project - 6,000 words

  • 2,679 Standard Tuition Fee
  • 12
    Credit Points
  • 0.125 EFT 
  • 7
    AQF level
  • Category advanced unit
    C
  • theologyUnit Discipline

Prerequisites

24cps TH

Corequisites

96cps of study, including 36 cps at AQF level 6

Exclusions

Prior to 2020, this unit content was delivered under the unit code TH490.

Learning outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, students will

A. Know and understand

 1. Demonstrate Functional knowledge and understanding of a selected TH topic

B. Be able to

1. Identify and problematise a selected TH topic

2. Devise and execute a method for achieving the purpose of the investigation

3. Discuss recent scholarship on the selected TH topic

4. Synthesise data from diverse scholarship to formulate Critical perspectives on the selected TH topic

5. Present Critical evidence-based perspectives on the selected TH topic (in an essay/report of 6000 words)

C. Be in a position to

1. Applying Functional perspectives and skills from independently investigated TH topics to ministry practice and Christian living as a reflective practitioner

Content

Regulations:

Candidates must submit a proposed programme of research to the course coordinator at their institution.

  1. The candidate’s approved institution is responsible to ensure that the appropriate pre-requisites have been met, that the candidate has the ability to complete the project satisfactorily, that effective supervision and resources are available, and that the program of study has been submitted to and approved by the appropriate Field moderator.
  2. The Research Topic may take the form of academic or field-based research on a particular aspect of one subject area, or across several areas or Fields. It must have clear aims and focus and requires completion of a 6,000 word project
  3. The completed Research Project must conform to the format specified for Projects in the Master of Arts (Theology) (Ministry). One copy is to be kept by the approved institution and one submitted to the designated Field Moderator.
  4. The Project shall be assessed by an appropriately qualified person within the candidate’s approved institution and moderated by the designated Field Moderator.